AI Council sends your question to several AIs at once, has them debate each other, and returns the single answer they agree on — with a ledger of what they don't.
One model can be confidently wrong. Different perspectives help you test the answer.
AI Council compares independent responses, invites critique and keeps unresolved points visible. Model agreement is useful evidence. You still make the decision.
Not a poll of chatbots — a structured deliberation that ends in one answer you can use.
Your question goes to each AI at once, each with its own role — the builder, the skeptic, the strategist.
Every model reads the others, concedes where it's wrong, and sharpens where it's right. Weak answers don't survive.
A chair merges it all into a single verdict and a numbered next step. Disagreements go to the ledger.
When the models can't agree, we don't average it away or hide it. We park it so you can revisit it when your context changes. Automatic scheduled revisits are planned.
The current pilot connects Google Gemini and reviewed Azure models. AWS Bedrock and Cloudflare AI integration are planned. Availability and usage limits are shown in the app.
Illustrative example. This is not a recorded model response.
Start with one city. Prove the model and fix what breaks cheaply, then scale. Going nationwide first just multiplies your early mistakes.
AI Council is a working early pilot. Explore the debate, synthesis and disagreement ledger. Usage is limited while we test the product.
Open the live pilot